“In what ways does Herbert Simon’s concept of ‘bounded rationality’ challenge the classical model of administrative decision-making? Explain its continuing relevance in contemporary governance.”

By challenging the traditional model of rational decision-making put forth by theorists such as Gulick and Urwick, Herbert Simon’s concept of constrained rationality signalled a significant change in administrative philosophy. Simon maintained that real-world decision-making is hampered by information, time and human cognition in contrast to classical theorists who saw administrators as completely rational agents with the capacity to make objective ideal decisions.

Simon’s Classical Rationality Critique:

• In order to choose the “one best way,” the classical model presupposes flawless information and rational analysis.
• Given that administrators frequently operate in an environment of ambiguity, incomplete data and organisational pressure, Simon contended that this was impractical.
• Making decisions is therefore about “satisficing,” or selecting a course of action that is adequate and satisfactory in light of the situation rather than “maximising.”

Critical Dimensions:

• Simon’s perspective evolved from idealistic efficiency to behavioural realism bringing psychology into public management.
• It proposed that administrative behaviour is as much cognitive and social as it is procedural, emphasising how values, perceptions and restricted thinking influence governance.
• In the age of AI-driven decision assistance and big data, bounded rationality persists. So algorithms and humans both operate within information constraints and biases.

Way Forward

• Modern administrative systems should balance data-driven decision-making with ethical and contextual judgement while acknowledging the limits of computational logic.
• To address cognitive and systemic limits, public institutions must improve information flows, feedback systems and participatory decision-making processes.
• Civil servant training should emphasise analytical flexibility, ethical reasoning and adaptive thinking over strict adherence to norms.
• Recognising constrained rationality also promotes humility in policy formulation as policies should be iterative, evidence-based and open to change.

Simon’s concept of bounded rationality helped to humanise public administration by replacing the myth of the perfectly rational bureaucrat with a more realistic decision-making model. Even today it is critical to understand how administrators think, choose and manage under the constraints of information, emotion, and institutional context.

UPSC General Studies Paper Preparation

Public Administration Optional Exam Preparation