The premise behind simultaneous elections is that regular elections cause disruptions to governance, incur significant administrative expenses, and shift political focus from policymaking to campaigning. Due to staggered State Assembly tenure, India currently experiences an “election cycle” every few months. The Model Code of Conduct (MCC), which limits policy announcements, transfers, and new schemes, is repeatedly imposed as a result, which has an impact on administrative continuity and development activities.
Elections held simultaneously could ease this administrative load, free up security personnel, and push political parties to prioritize long-term governance over ongoing electoral mobilization. Additionally, it would save money for political players and the Election Commission. But there are a number of issues with the concept. In order to synchronize all elections, federalism-related constitutional amendments—particularly those pertaining to Articles 172 and 356—must be made, which could compromise state authority. State governments might no longer be able to call new mandates or dissolve assemblies. Additionally, elections are a democratic accountability mechanism; fewer elections could put representatives at a distance from the opinions of voters.
Large-scale voting infrastructure, security deployment, and voter control present additional logistical difficulties. Simultaneous elections may simplify government, but they must be planned without sacrificing political stability, democratic accountability, or federal spirit.
UPSC General Studies Paper Preparation
Public Administration Optional Exam Preparation
| Topic | |
| Public Administration Syllabus | Public Administration Foundation 2025-26 |
| Public Administration Free Resources | Public Administration Crash Cum Enrichment Course 2025-26 |
About the Author: Jyoti Verma
