Rights-Based Welfare and Administrative Accountability

Overview

Rights-based welfare redefines the relationship between residents and the state by moving away from discretionary relief and towards legally enforceable entitlements. This shift is best illustrated by employment guarantee-based welfare, which imposes legally obligatory duties on public administration.

Administrative Underpinnings of Welfare Based on Rights

By requiring timely service delivery and recompense for administrative failure, these welfare regimes institutionalise accountability. Decentralised planning and community involvement increase responsiveness and openness by further integrating democratic norms into governance.

Fiscal and Administrative Difficulties

By the late 2010s, issues with administrative rigour and fiscal sustainability have surfaced. Implementation quality was impacted by fund delivery delays, grassroots capacity limitations, and complicated procedures. Administrators have placed more focus on planning, outcome-based governance, and cost control.

Efficiency and Accountability Conundrum

The fundamental conflict in public administration is between administrative discretion and legal accountability. Excessive administrative discretion runs the potential of weakening statutory commitments, even when rights-based assurances advance equity and justice. In a similar vein, accountability gaps result from decentralisation without corresponding authority.

The Way Ahead

Instead of undermining legislative protections, sustainable reform necessitates bolstering administrative capability. Efficiency and rights-based governance can coexist with timely payments, better planning, strengthened local institutions, and strong social accountability systems.

UPSC General Studies Paper Preparation

Public Administration Optional Exam Preparation