“Riggs’ Prismatic-Sala model remains a relevant analytical framework for understanding the administrative systems of developing societies. Discuss.”

Riggs’ Model and Its Context

In Administration in Developing Countries (1964), Fred W. Riggs created the Prismatic-Sala model to describe transitional civilisations. He maintained that the combination of traditional and modern characteristics in developing countries results in inefficiency and administrative complexity. His ecological approach placed a strong emphasis on the need to examine administration within the context of its social, cultural, and economic surroundings.

Key Features of the Prismatic-Sala Model

Heterogeneity, formalism, and overlapping roles are characteristics of a prismatic society. The Sala model, which Riggs used to demonstrate this, demonstrates how organisations may have a formal existence but frequently operate informally. For example, in India, the traditional power of caste and community coexists with democratic institutions like Parliament and RTI, influencing government in conflicting ways.

Application to India

One glaring illustration of heterogeneity in India is the contrast between traditional and modern values. Formalism is demonstrated by the disparity between the law and reality, such as the limited application of the Right to Information Act. It is obvious that a local leader’s roles overlap when they simultaneously act as a politician, businessman, and social broker. These details corroborate Riggs’ finding that rising countries face unique administrative challenges that Western models are unable to adequately capture.

Critical Perspectives

Although Riggs’ paradigm provides profound insights, it has drawn criticism for being ethnocentric and for depicting emerging countries as inferior to the West. Furthermore, the model’s explanatory capacity has diminished due to changes in administrative systems brought about by globalisation, ICT-based governance, and democratic reforms. Modern strategies like Digital Era Governance and the Good Governance paradigm offer more pertinent instruments for modern reforms.

Conclusion

Although Riggs’ paradigm provides profound insights, it has drawn criticism for being ethnocentric and for depicting emerging countries as inferior to the West. Furthermore, the model’s explanatory capacity has diminished due to changes in administrative systems brought about by globalisation, ICT-based governance, and democratic reforms. Modern strategies like Digital Era Governance and the Good Governance paradigm offer more pertinent instruments for modern reforms.

UPSC General Studies Paper Preparation

Public Administration Optional Exam Preparation