Judicial Directions on GST, Basic Structure and Environmental Governance

The government says that if the High Court tells them to lower the GST on air purifiers it will go against the rules of the Constitution. This shows that there is a problem between the court getting too involved the government making money and taking care of the environment. We need to be careful and find a balance between what the Constitution says and keeping people healthy. The government and the court have to think about the GST, on air purifiers and how it affects peoples health.

Separation of Powers

• Fixation of tax rates is a legislative–executive function, not a judicial one.
• Judicial directions mandating GST changes amount to policy substitution rather than constitutional review.

The separation of powers is an important thing. It is part of the structure like they said in the Kesavananda Bharati case. This means that courts cannot just do whatever they want with money. The separation of powers restricts courts from taking on jobs that have to do with money, which is known as roles. The separation of powers is what keeps this from happening.

GST and Cooperative Federalism

• The Goods and Services Tax operates through the Goods and Services Tax Council under Article 279A. This is an example of cooperative federalism, in action, where the Goods and Services Tax Council works together. The Goods and Services Tax Council is very important for the Goods and Services Tax to work properly.
• The Council makes sure that the Centre and the States are happy with how money’s shared between them. They do this by talking things over and agreeing on what’s fair, for the Centre and the States.
• The court can get in the way. Change things, which is not what the constitution says should happen and that takes away the power of the states to make their own financial decisions. Judicial intervention is a problem because it can bypass the rules that’re in place and that undermines the financial independence of the states. This is an issue because states need to be able to make their own decisions about money and judicial intervention can take that away which is not what the constitution says should happen and that is a problem, for state autonomy.

Environmental Governance Perspective

• The courts have done a good thing by making Article 21 bigger. Now Article 21 also says that people have the right to live in an healthy environment. This means that the courts think that Article 21 should include the right to an healthy environment so people can live in a nice place. The courts have made it clear that Article 21 is not about some things it is also about the right, to a clean and healthy environment.
• Air purifiers help deal with the health problems that air pollution causes right now. Air purifiers are really important because they make the air cleaner and safer for people to breathe. Air purifiers can make a difference, in the health of people who live in areas with a lot of air pollution. The air purifiers help remove things from the air that people breathe.
• We need to protect the environment. We have to do it in a way that is allowed by the law. This means that the government should make rules to protect the environment, not the courts. The courts should not be telling the government how to collect taxes that is not their job. Environmental protection is important so the government should make policies that help the environment. These policies should be fair and follow the law.
• While judicial concern for environmental health is justified, constitutional governance requires institutional restraint. Sustainable solutions lie in strengthening executive policy responses through the GST Council, ensuring environmental justice without eroding the constitutional balance of power.

UPSC General Studies Paper Preparation

Public Administration Optional Exam Preparation

About the Author: Jyoti Verma