Ensuring Social Justice in Bureaucracy: Addressing Representation of SC/ST and OBC Officers
Context: During a parliamentary session on July 29, 2024, the Leader of the Opposition, Rahul Gandhi, raised concerns about the lack of representation of Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC) officers in the Budget-making process. His remarks highlighted a significant issue in the Indian bureaucracy: the underrepresentation of officers from traditionally deprived communities at senior levels, which has implications for social justice and policy formulation.
The absence of SC/ST officers in the Budget-making process, as pointed out by Rahul Gandhi, reflects a deeper issue of upper-caste domination in the senior ranks of the Indian civil service. Despite affirmative action policies, the representation of SC/ST and OBC officers at the highest levels remains inadequate. As revealed in a parliamentary response by Minister of State Jitendra Singh in December 2022, out of 322 senior officers, only a small fraction belonged to these communities, with SCs and STs comprising only 4% and 4.9% of Secretary and Joint Secretary positions, respectively.
This underrepresentation is not merely a matter of numbers; it underscores a systemic issue where officers from reserved categories often join the civil service at a later age and retire before reaching top positions. The current retirement system, based on age rather than tenure, disadvantages these officers despite their competence and potential.
Key Issues:
Age of Entry and Retirement:
- SC/ST and OBC candidates typically join the civil services later due to the extended age limits for their categories. However, this late entry often prevents them from ascending to the highest ranks before retirement.
- The current system favors younger entrants, who can rise to top positions despite potentially lower performance levels, simply due to their earlier start.
Fixed Tenure Proposal
- To ensure fair representation, a fixed tenure of service, such as 35 years, irrespective of the age of entry, could be implemented. This would allow all officers an equal opportunity to reach senior positions.
- Adjustments to the upper age limit for entry could be made to ensure that officers do not serve beyond a reasonable retirement age, such as 67 years, with regular health assessments for those over 62.
Way Forward
- Constitute a Committee:An independent and multi-disciplinary committee should be formed to examine the proposal of a fixed tenure system. This committee must include adequate representation from SC/ST, OBC, and Persons with Benchmark Disabilities (PwBD) communities to ensure an unbiased review.
- Reevaluate Retirement Policies: The government should consider revising the retirement age policy, focusing on competence and efficiency rather than the age of entry, to ensure that deserving officers from all backgrounds have the opportunity to reach senior positions.
- Promote Inclusivity in Senior Positions: Implement measures to actively promote the representation of officers from deprived communities in senior roles, ensuring that the bureaucracy reflects the diverse fabric of Indian society.
The underrepresentation of SC/ST, OBC, and minority officers in senior bureaucratic positions is a barrier to achieving true social justice within the Indian civil service. Addressing this requires a shift from the current age-based retirement system to a tenure-based approach, ensuring that all officers, regardless of their background, have an equal opportunity to contribute at the highest levels of government. By taking these steps, India can move closer to realizing the vision of a just and inclusive society.