“Delegative legislation has become a strategic tool in the hands of executive, despite its utility.” Comment.

Answer: Delegated legislation or secondary legislation, refers to the process by which legislative powers are delegated to executive or administrative bodies to create rules, regulations, and laws. The statement suggests that delegative legislation has become a strategic tool in the hands of the executive, despite its utility. Here are some perspectives to consider:

  1. Increased Efficiency and Expertise: Delegative legislation allows the executive to respond quickly to evolving situations, emerging issues, and technical matters that require specialized knowledge.
  2. Flexibility and Adaptability: Delegated legislation provides flexibility for the executive to adapt laws and regulations to specific contexts or circumstances without having to navigate lengthy legislative processes.
  3. Potential for Abuse of Power: While delegative legislation can be useful, it also carries the risk of abuse of power by the executive. The extensive use of delegated powers without sufficient checks and balances can undermine democratic principles and lead to executive overreach.
  4. Lack of Public Scrutiny: Delegative legislation is often enacted through administrative or executive procedures rather than full parliamentary debates. This can limit the extent to which the public, civil society, and other stakeholders can scrutinize and contribute to the law-making process.
  5. Risk of Inadequate Safeguards: Delegative legislation should be accompanied by adequate safeguards to prevent the abuse of power and ensure accountability. This includes clear guidelines for the exercise of delegated powers, mechanisms for judicial review, sunset clauses, reporting requirements, and robust oversight mechanisms.
    In summary, delegative legislation can be a useful tool for the executive to address evolving needs, enhance efficiency, and benefit from specialized expertise. However, its potential for abuse of power and the lack of public scrutiny are legitimate concerns. Striking a balance
    between the executive’s need for flexibility and democratic principles requires robust safeguards and oversight mechanisms to ensure transparency, accountability, and the protection of democratic values.

UPSC General Studies Paper Preparation

Topic
UPSC SyllabusGS Genius-50 Program
Public administration crash courseUPSC GS Mains 2025 Study Material
About the Author: Nitin Kumar Singh 

Scroll to Top