DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS QUIZ – 27 January, 2026

Explanation:
India’s cultural diversity makes uniform standards difficult. What is obscene for one group may be acceptable for another. Digital content crosses regional and cultural boundaries. Strict enforcement risks over-censorship. Loose enforcement risks harm. Balancing pluralism with regulation is complex. Courts may face frequent challenges. Hence, subjectivity remains the core long-term challenge.

Explanation:
Globally, platforms are no longer seen as neutral pipelines. They influence public discourse and behaviour. Governments increasingly regulate them as intermediaries with social responsibilities. India’s draft rules align with this trend. Accountability, transparency, and user safety are emphasised. The state is redefining digital governance norms. Thus, platforms are treated as public intermediaries.

Explanation:
Algorithms determine content visibility and recommendations. Harmful or obscene content often spreads due to algorithmic amplification. The rules expect platforms to prevent such promotion. This marks a shift from passive hosting to active responsibility. It recognises the power of digital architecture. Curbing amplification reduces indirect harm. Hence, algorithmic spread is the focus.

Explanation:
Freedom of expression is not absolute under the Constitution. Reasonable restrictions apply in the interest of morality and decency. Child rights further strengthen the case for regulation. The draft rules aim to prevent harm without silencing dissent. Artistic and social expression remain protected in principle. The challenge lies in implementation. Thus, morality and child protection are the balancing factors.

Explanation:
Large platforms have resources to deploy moderation tools and legal teams. Smaller platforms may struggle with compliance costs. Setting up grievance redressal and classification systems is resource-intensive. Algorithmic moderation also requires investment. This may affect innovation and market entry. Hence, smaller digital players face disproportionate burdens. This is a key policy concern.