DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS QUIZ – 24 December, 2025

Explanation:
The issue involves environmental conservation, mining regulation, governance, and judicial decision-making. These themes fall squarely under GS Paper III. It can be used as a contemporary case study. The topic enriches answers on sustainable development. It is also useful for essays. Hence, GS III is most appropriate.

Explanation:
Ecological conditions vary across the Aravalli range. Region-specific zoning allows protection based on biodiversity, hydrology, and human pressure. Scientific mapping and satellite monitoring can guide such zoning. It balances development with conservation. This approach is adaptive and flexible. It avoids one-size-fits-all regulation.

Explanation:
Article 21 guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. The Supreme Court has interpreted it to include the right to a clean and healthy environment. Most environmental PILs rely on this expanded interpretation. Forest, mining, and pollution cases invoke Article 21. It strengthens judicial oversight. The Aravalli case also draws from this jurisprudence.

Explanation:
The case reflects tension between developmental priorities and ecological protection. Governments emphasize infrastructure growth and housing needs. Environmentalists highlight irreversible ecological damage. Courts must balance both interests. The 100-metre rule reflects administrative convenience. This dilemma is central to India’s sustainable development debate.

Explanation:
Mining and real-estate expansion have severely degraded the Aravalli ecosystem. These activities lead to deforestation, groundwater depletion, and air pollution. Illegal mining has been repeatedly flagged by courts. Urban construction fragments wildlife corridors. Ecological services of the range are weakened. Hence, this is the primary cause of damage.