DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS QUIZ – 20 September, 2025

 Explanation: Trade and strategy often intersect. US tariff cuts directly boost Indian exports, while Chabahar sanctions impact India’s strategic access to Central Asia. Together, these issues show how India’s economic and strategic interests are intertwined, shaping foreign policy choices. SAARC revival, BRICS+, or space missions do not capture this immediate trade-strategy nexus.

 Explanation: India-US trade disputes have often arisen over US tariffs on Indian steel/aluminium, India’s restrictions on agricultural imports (like dairy and poultry), and US concerns on intellectual property rights (especially in pharmaceuticals). Subsidies in IT are not a major dispute. Hence 1, 2, and 3 are correct.

 Explanation: Lower tariffs make Indian products more competitive in the American market. For example, sectors like textiles, leather, engineering goods, and pharmaceuticals will benefit. This eases the trade deficit and strengthens bilateral economic ties. It does not directly impact energy security, UN peacekeeping, or agriculture investment.

 Explanation: India did not criticize the pact directly but reaffirmed its strong ties with Saudi Arabia. This reflects strategic autonomy—India’s approach of maintaining independent foreign policy choices without being forced into alliances or camps. Non-alignment was a Cold War principle; today, India practices a flexible, pragmatic version through strategic autonomy.

 Explanation: Pakistan’s close ties with Saudi Arabia could embolden Islamabad strategically and militarily, raising security concerns for India. At the same time, Saudi Arabia is a vital partner for India in energy, diaspora welfare, and investment. Hence, India must balance caution with diplomacy. This development highlights the delicate regional balance of power India must maintain.