DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS QUIZ – 12 December, 2025 –

Explanation:
The Court’s emphasis goes beyond legality to humane outcomes. Justice is seen as a living, human-centred process. Prolonged suffering without review is avoided. The approach integrates law, ethics, and empathy. It strengthens public trust in judiciary. Humane justice is a core democratic value.

Explanation:
Autonomy refers to respecting patient’s wishes, while beneficence focuses on acting in patient’s best interest. In coma cases, patients cannot express consent. Doctors and families must balance care with dignity. This ethical dilemma is central to medical ethics. Courts attempt to harmonise both principles.

Explanation:
Judges are not trained medical professionals. Medical decisions require scientific evaluation and prognosis. Courts therefore rely on expert medical boards. This avoids judicial overreach. It strengthens evidence-based adjudication. It also ensures credibility of decisions.

Explanation:
Ethics in governance emphasises empathy and humane treatment. The Court’s concern for a person in coma reflects compassion. It prioritises dignity over procedural rigidity. Compassion guides moral decision-making in difficult situations. This aligns with constitutional ethics. It is relevant for public service values.

Explanation:
Medical boards provide expert opinion but do not take final decisions. Courts retain ultimate authority to safeguard constitutional rights. This prevents misuse or coercion. Judicial approval ensures transparency and accountability. It balances medical expertise with legal oversight. This layered process protects patient dignity.