Context
The Gender Budget (GB) for 2024-25 has reached a significant milestone, equaling 1% of GDP and crossing ₹3 lakh crore in allocations for pro-women programs. This marks a notable shift in focus towards women-led development, as highlighted by the Finance Minister in the Budget announcements.
Components of the Gender Budget Statement (GBS)
- Part A: This section reports expenditures on schemes with 100% allocation for women. The recent increase in Part A allocations, particularly due to the inclusion of the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY), has significantly boosted overall GB figures.
- Part B: This section covers programs with allocations ranging from 30% to 99% for women. It reflects partial allocations of broader schemes aimed at both men and women but with a significant focus on women.
- Part C: Newly introduced, this section includes schemes with less than 30% provisioning for women. For example, the PM Kisan scheme’s inclusion in Part C with a 25% allocation reflects a more nuanced approach to reporting.
Instances of Over-reporting and Under-reporting
- Over-reporting: Certain programs, such as the PM Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP), have been reported with allocations for women without adequate explanation. The PMAY’s full inclusion in Part A, despite not all beneficiaries being women, also raises concerns about over-reporting.
- Under-reporting: Some schemes have been inaccurately represented, such as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS). Although 59.3% of workdays under MGNREGA were by women, only 33.6% of its budget is reflected in the GBS. Additionally, schemes like PM Vishwakarma and Stand-Up India have missed pro-women allocations in the GBS, leading to under-reporting.
Rectifying Anomalies in the Gender Budget
- Incorporating Explanations: The government should include detailed explanations for entries in the GBS to ensure transparency and accuracy. This would assist in conducting gender audits and improving gender outcomes in government programs.
- Systematic Approach: There is a need for a more scientific and systematic approach to reporting in the GBS. The current method still lacks consistency, leading to over- and under-reporting.
- Ensuring Accurate Representation: Programs like MGNREGS should reflect actual participation rates of women in their allocations. The rationale behind these allocations should be clearly stated to avoid discrepancies.
- Comprehensive Inclusion: The GBS should ensure that all relevant schemes, especially those targeting women entrepreneurs and workers, are accurately reported. This includes schemes like PM Vishwakarma and Stand-Up India, which were omitted in the current GBS.
Conclusion
While the Gender Budget for 2024-25 marks a positive shift in prioritizing women-led development, it also highlights the need for improved reporting and transparency. Accurate representation and systematic reporting in the GBS are essential to ensure that gender-responsive budgeting truly addresses the needs of women and contributes to closing gender gaps in the economy.