DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS QUIZ – 23 January, 2026

Explanation:
Urban planning influences availability of open and indoor spaces. Climate-sensitive design can protect athletes. Sports infrastructure can support public health objectives. Environmental considerations reduce long-term risks. Integrated planning avoids policy silos. It ensures efficient resource use. Community access to safe sports facilities improves. This creates multi-sectoral benefits. Hence, synergy between health, environment and sports is achieved.

Explanation:
Policy attention is shifting from events and medals to athlete well-being. Health risks from pollution and heat are now recognised. Training conditions are being scrutinised. Athlete safety standards are evolving. This aligns sports policy with public health and environmental goals. Governance frameworks are adapting accordingly. The athlete is seen as a stakeholder, not just a performer. Hence, governance is becoming athlete-centric.

Explanation:
Frequent disruptions discourage regular participation in sports. Parents may restrict children from outdoor activities. Lack of alternatives leads to sedentary behaviour. Motivation among young athletes declines. Talent drop-out rates may increase. This undermines grassroots sports culture. Public health goals of promoting physical activity are contradicted. The social value of sports weakens. Hence, long-term participation declines.

Explanation:
Climate variability has increased unpredictability in weather patterns. Heatwaves, smog episodes, and heavy rainfall are more frequent. Outdoor training is often unsafe. Indoor facilities allow controlled temperature and air quality. They ensure continuity and safety. This is crucial for both training and competitions. Sports calendars increasingly depend on indoor alternatives. Thus, climate variability makes indoor facilities essential.

Explanation:
Sports infrastructure involves multiple authorities such as urban bodies, education departments, and sports ministries. Environmental regulation is handled by separate institutions. Coordination between these agencies is weak. As a result, climate risks are not integrated into sports planning. Policy responses remain reactive rather than preventive. Accountability becomes diffused. This fragmentation delays long-term solutions. Integrated governance is missing. Hence, institutional fragmentation is the core issue.