Source: TH
Context: Sonam Wangchuk initiated a 21-day hunger strike in Leh, Ladakh, advocating for Ladakh’s statehood and its inclusion on the Sixth Schedule.
Historical Background: Ladakh’s Complex Past
- Dynasty Rule: Ladakh was formerly governed by the Namgyal Dynasty.
- Loss of Independence: In 1834, it came under Dogra rule for a century.
- Integration into India: Post-1947, Ladakh became a part of India within Jammu & Kashmir.
Calls for Autonomy
- Cultural Distinctiveness: Ladakh pursued separation from Kashmir due to its unique cultural identity.
- Unmet Requests: Despite appeals, the central government did not grant autonomy.
- Neglect and Discrimination: Ladakh received negligible budget allocations compared to Jammu & Kashmir.
Rise of the Union Territory Movement
- Feelings of Neglect: Ladakhis felt marginalized and pushed for UT status.
- District Division: Leh and Kargil were separated in 1979, perceived as a political tactic.
- Partial Fulfillment: Ladakh gained reserved status and formed autonomous councils but with limited authority.
Creation of Ladakh as a Union Territory
- Persistent Demands: Ladakh continued to demand UT status.
- Article 370 Revocation: In 2019, Ladakh was designated a separate UT.
- Mixed Reactions: Leh celebrated, while Kargil protested against the decision.
Concerns and Post-UT Demands:
- Loss of Protections: Removal of Article 370 and 35A raised concerns.
- Outsider Influence: Fear of unchecked development and cultural dilution.
- Governance Challenges: Lack of local governance control emerged as an issue.
Ongoing Protests in Ladakh:
- Unified Protest: Leh Apex Body and Kargil Democratic Alliance joined forces.
- Key Demands: Inclusion in the Sixth Schedule and attainment of statehood.
- Protests and Hunger Strikes: Demonstrations persisted, including Wangchuk’s hunger strikes.
Government’s Position
- Security Focus: Emphasis on military infrastructure due to security concerns.
- Economic Priorities: Facilitating corporate investments for economic growth.
- Precedent Setting: Reluctance to accede to demands fearing similar requests from other regions.
Core Issues of Trust and Development
- Trust Deficit: Ladakhis fear losing control over their future.
- Developmental Needs: Desire for development that respects Ladakhi heritage.
Conclusion
- Importance of Governance: Ladakh hunger strike underscores the need to address governance and environmental challenges.
- Sustainable Development: Vital for ensuring long-term peace and prosperity in the region.
